LEGITIMATE AIM, NECESSITY AND PROPORTIONALITY: TESTING PROTEST RESTRICTIONS IN INDIA AND UKRAINE UNDER THE ICCPR FRAMEWORK

Prabhpreet Singh

LEGITIMATE AIM, NECESSITY AND PROPORTIONALITY: TESTING PROTEST RESTRICTIONS IN INDIA AND UKRAINE UNDER THE ICCPR FRAMEWORK

Автор(и)

Prabhpreet Singh

Анотація

LEGITIMATE AIM, NECESSITY AND PROPORTIONALITY: TESTING PROTEST RESTRICTIONS IN INDIA AND UKRAINE UNDER THE ICCPR FRAMEWORK

Біографія автора

Prabhpreet Singh

Assistant Professor at School of Law,

Mahindra University

Посилання

1. Subhajit Basu and Shameek Sen, “Silenced Voices: Unravelling India’s Dissent Crisis through Historical and Contemporary Analysis of Free Speech and Suppression,” Information & Communications Technology Law, vol. 33, no. 1, 2024, pp. 42–65.

2. Adelaida Kim v. Uzbekistan, CCPR/C/122/D/2175/2012

3. Andrei Sannikov v. Belarus, (CCPR/C/122/D/2212/2012)

4. Bukta and Others v. Hungary, Application no. 25691/04 Final, Judgement of 17.10.2007, para 38.

5. Ollinger v Austria, Application no. 76900/01, Judgement of 29.09.2006, para 47.

6. Himmat Lal Shah v. Commissioner of Police, Ahmadabad and Another, (1973) 1 SCC 227, Judgment of 15.09.1972.

7. Ramlila Maidan Incident v. Home Secretary and Ors, Judgment of 23.02.2012, 2012 AIR SCW 3660 para 33, 44, & 45.

8. Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan v. Union of India & Anr, Judgment of 23.07. 2018, AIR 2018 SC(CRI) 1105 para 54.

9. Anita Thakur v. State of Jammu & Kashmir (2016) 15 SCC 525

10. Amit Sahni v. Commissioner of Police (Shaheen Bagh Case), (2020) 10 SCC

11. Verentsov v. Ukraine App no 20372/11 (ECHR 11 April 2013)